LINCOLN — Gov. Pete Ricketts on Monday issued a statement regarding the denial for a disaster declaration from the Federal Emergency Management Agency.
The notice follows an appeal of an earlier decision to deny a federal disaster declaration for severe storms, tornadoes, straight-line winds and flooding that damaged the state during the span between July 15 and Sept. 17, 2019. The original declaration request identified 16 counties seeking federal assistance for ongoing damages to public infrastructure and three counties who requested additional assistance for individuals.
Those counties are Adams, Brown, Cherry, Clay, Custer, Dawson, Grant, Hall, Hamilton, Hayes, Howard, Logan, Loup, Rock, Thayer and Valley.
“While we wish the federal government was able to fulfill our request, there is a process in place to assist counties that meet a certain threshold when FEMA denies a request,” Ricketts said. “We are reviewing the assistance that can be provided to counties through that process at this time.”
Sign up for Kearney Hub daily news updates
The denial from FEMA stated the damage of the event was not of the severity and magnitude that warrants a major disaster declaration. Nebraska authorities identified an additional $2 million in weather-related costs in 16 counties. While the overall fiscal effect associated with storms during this period was relatively low, the ongoing effect to local budgets and the need to repair damages were cited by Ricketts in his request for federal assistance.
“Local jurisdictions may be able to qualify for assistance under the state emergency declaration issued for this event period,” said Nebraska Emergency Management Agency Assistant Director Bryan Tuma. “NEMA staff have initiated a review of the data and will assess eligibility for reimbursement under the state program. The state program can reimburse eligible applicants with a 50 percent cost share for the amount of damages which exceed the designated threshold.”
The request for a disaster declaration was directed to FEMA on Oct. 23. Following the initial denial, the request subsequently was appealed on Dec. 4.